nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2026, 01, No.161 51-58
生态翻译学的理论建构、学术争鸣与未来进路
基金项目(Foundation): 安徽省哲社重点项目“中国翻译批评的控场力与批判力研究”(项目编号:AHSKD2024D024)
邮箱(Email):
DOI:
发布时间: 2026-02-25
出版时间: 2026-02-25
移动端阅读
摘要:

生态翻译学经历了从“选择论”到“三生相”“四生观”的阶段性发展,形成了翻译生态论、翻译选择论、译者中心论和三维转换论在内的四大核心理论主张。生态翻译学在理论层面整合了翻译环境,凸显了译者的主体性,并通过关联序链拓展了翻译研究的视野;在实践层面,其倡导的生态翻译理念促进了跨文化交际与生态文明的协同发展。然而,该理论在发展过程中也面临诸多争议,如“译者中心论”的合理性、相似类比方法的科学性、“中庸之道”作为理论支点的适用性,以及纯理导向研究的客观性等问题。梳理生态翻译学的发展脉络、理论贡献及现存问题,旨在为该理论的后续研究提供参考,推动其从新兴理论走向成熟体系,最终为全球翻译学研究贡献中国智慧。

Abstract:

Undergoing a phased development from "selection theory" to "three-life forms" and "four-life perspectives",eco-translatology has formed four core theoretical propositions: translational eco-environment, translation as adaptation and selection,translator-centeredness, and three-dimensional transformation. At the theoretical level, eco-translatology integrates the translation environment, highlights the subjectivity of translators, and expands the horizons of translation studies through the chain of relevance.At the practical level, its advocacy of ecological translation promotes the synergy between cross-cultural communication and ecological civilization. However, this theory has also faced numerous controversies during its development, such as the rationality of the "translator-centered" approach, the scientific validity of analogical reasoning, the applicability of the "Golden Mean" as a theoretical foundation, and the objectivity of pure theory-oriented research. By reviewing the developmental trajectory, theoretical contributions,and existing issues of eco-translatology, this paper aims to provide a reference for future research, facilitating its evolution from an emerging theory to a mature system and ultimately contributing Chinese wisdom to global translation studies.

参考文献

[1]Naess, A.The shallow and the deep,longrange ecology movement.A summary[J].Inquiry,1973,16(1-4):95-100.

[2]Cronin, M.Translation and globalization[M].London:Routledge,2003:85-102.

[3]Bassnett, S. Lefevere A. Constructing cultures:Essays on literary translation[M].Clevedon:Multilingual Matters,1998:1-13.

[4]Scott, C. Translating the nineteenth century:a poetics of eco-translation[J].Dix-Neuf,2015,19(3):285-302.

[5]胡庚申,王园.生态翻译学研究范式:定位、内涵与特征[J].外语教学,2021(6):1-6.

[6]黄忠廉,王世超.生态翻译学二十载:乐见成长期待新高[J].外语教学,2021(6):12-16.

[7]胡庚申.以“生”为本的向“生”译道:生态翻译学的哲学“三问”审视[J].中国翻译,2021(6):5-14,190.

[8]方梦之.走向国际的生态翻译学[J].外语电化教学,2024(1):3-8,113.

[9]胡庚申,陈怡飞,李晓晓,生态翻译学与西方翻译理论比较研究的新思考:三论生态翻译学的“异”与“新”[J].中国外语,2025(5):91-97.

[10]胡庚申,孟凡君,蒋骁华,等.生态翻译学的“四生”理念:胡庚申教授访谈[J].鄱阳湖学刊,2019(6):26-33,125-126.

[11]顾俊玲,黄忠廉.胡庚申译学思想生成考[J].外语研究,2023(6):103-107.

[12]胡庚申.生态翻译学的研究焦点与理论视角[J].中国翻译,2011(2):5-9,95.

[13]王静.政治话语AI翻译的生态伦理与优化策略[J].上海翻译,2025(6):20-24.

[14]蓝红军,冯丽霞.翻译理论建构的多元融合:生态翻译学20年(2001—2021)之启思[J].中国外语,2022(1):105-111.

[15]冷育宏.生态翻译理论下译者真的是“中心”吗:与胡庚申教授商榷[J].上海翻译,2011(3):71-73.

[16]王宏.生态翻译学核心理念考辨[J].上海翻译,2011(4):10-11.

[17]胡庚申.关于“译者中心”问题的回应[J].上海翻译,2011(4):7-9.

[18]Berman, A. The experience of the foreign:Culture and translation in romantic Germany[M].Albany:State University of New York Press,1992:74-85.

[19]Venuti,L.The translator's invisibility:A history of translation[M].London:Routledge,1995:1-34.

[20]Chesterman, A. Proposal for a hieronymic oath[J].The Translator,2001,7(2):139-154.

[21]胡庚申,李素文.生态翻译学与西方翻译理论话语体系的比较研究:再论生态翻译学的“异”和“新”[J].中国外语,2022(1):98-104.

[22]冯全功.试论生态美学对生态翻译学的启发与拓展[J].外语教学,2021(6):91-95.

[23]Snell-Hornby, Mary.The Turns of Translation Studies[M].Amsterdam/Philadelphia:John Benj amins Publishing Company,2006.

[24]Bassnett, S.&Lefevere, A. Introduction:Pro ust's grandmother and the thousand and one nights:The'cultural turn'in translation studies[A].Bassnett,S.(eds.).Translation, history and culture[C].Shanghai:Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press,2004:1-13.

[25]仲伟合,朱琳.具身认知视角下的翻译认知心理特征与过程[J].外国语,2015(6):68-78.

[26]刘润泽,魏向清.生态译学话语构建的术语批评路径及其反思:知识生产与话语传播[J].外语学刊,2017(3):74-79.

[27]尹穗琼.生态翻译学若干问题探讨:与胡庚申教授就《生态翻译学:建构与诠释》中的部分观点进行商榷[J].天津外国语大学学报,2017(3):56-62.

[28]罗迪江,胡庚申.关于生态翻译学相关问题的再思考:对尹穗琼商榷文章的回应[J].天津外国语大学学报,2017(3):63-68.

[29]武俊辉,邹霂瑾.关于生态翻译学若干问题的反思[J].上海翻译,2021(5):17-22.

[30]王剑.生态翻译学在“纯理”导向性研究维度的问题剖析[J].外国语,2021(4):85-93.

[31]黄瑞,王园.澄清与辨析:关于生态翻译学的中观研究[J].外国语,2023(4):108-118.

[32]Cronin, M.Eco-translation:Translation and ecology in the age of the anthropocene[M].London:Routledge,2017:15-32.

基本信息:

中图分类号:H059

引用信息:

[1]胡作友,邵红茹.生态翻译学的理论建构、学术争鸣与未来进路[J].兴义民族师范学院学报,2026,No.161(01):51-58.

基金信息:

安徽省哲社重点项目“中国翻译批评的控场力与批判力研究”(项目编号:AHSKD2024D024)

发布时间:

2026-02-25

出版时间:

2026-02-25

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文